October 2006

Vol. 4, No. 5

Good morning,

We hope you enjoy this month's In-Store Marketer. If you are an In-Store Marketing Institute member and have forgotten your user name or password, click here. Non-members can gain temporary access to the Institute website by contacting Nathan at (847) 675-7400, ext. 174, to schedule a brief phone tour.

October 2006 Highlights

Cause and Effectiveness

"Can you tell me what sales lift I'll get by placing shelf signs next to my product?"

The Institute has fielded questions like this on a regular basis since launching in 2003. Sister publication P-O-P Times has been hearing them since 1987. People, in general, need certainty in their lives, and marketers in particular crave statistics that will inform their decisions -- not to mention help their programs gain approval from above. So they relentlessly seek industry benchmarks, estimates, averages and percentages that will turn their hunches into hard fact.

Of course, the real answer to the above question (and all those like it) is no -- if not an emphatic one then at least a fairly definitive one. There are far too many determining factors to accommodate industry-wide averages for effectiveness. For starters, are you selling Macintosh Apples or Apple eMacs? Also consider brand awareness, channel, seasonality, competitive activity, rationality, shopper demographics -- heck, find out if it's going to snow the week after your shelf signs go up. After that, decide what kind of communication you'll be using on the sign.

Then, maybe, you can try asking that question again. But remember that the existence of an average almost assuredly implies above- and below-average performance: if shelf signs in your universe produce an average 20% sales lift, that suggests somebody's poor results are balancing out the other guy's strong gains.

That, however, is one of the exciting things about the Pioneering Research for an In-Store Metric (P.R.I.S.M.) project the Institute announced last month at the In-Store Marketing Expo. The ability to measure in-store traffic at the category level will greatly aid statistic-starved marketers both directly and indirectly:

  • Directly by delivering reliable traffic numbers: All marketers will know the potential reach that a shelf sign in a specific location at a particular store will have. That's a huge development for in-store marketing, which has never had a market-wide metric of evaluation akin to those employed in mass media advertising.
     
  • Indirectly by paving the way for effectiveness analysis: Knowing how many consumers may be reached with an in-store program is the first step. Next will be developing a method for measuring compliance, to determine how many of those shelf signs were placed in stores. That information can then be analyzed along with sales data to determine effectiveness.

It will take a lot more work to get to that point, and the Institute is collaborating now with members of the In-Store Metrics Consortium on the next phase of development for the P.R.I.S.M. project.

Ultimately, there still isn't going to be a simple, catch-all answer to that initial question. Industry-wide averages will always have limited accuracy because of the above-mentioned variables -- which is why determining true effectiveness will be the internal responsibility of each product manufacturer and retailer. There probably will be general -- and questionable -- industry statistics established for those marketers who simply must have them. But at least they'll be a little more accurate, too.

But in addition to being a vital step in the drive toward measuring effectiveness (a point that received much attention in media coverage of the announcement), the P.R.I.S.M project will provide a new way for marketers to evaluate the store.

That, in itself, should answer a lot of the questions keeping marketers up at night.

Peter Breen
Managing Director, Content
In-Store Marketing Institute

Members: More information here.

Desktop Conference: "What Retail Wants" by Robert Mariano of Roundy's Supermarkets

Successful retailers are adapting to the changing needs of shoppers, not predicting what they'll want, according to Robert Mariano, ceo of Roundy's Supermarkets. In an audio-enabled keynote presentation from last month's In-Store Marketing Expo, Mariano explains why marketers need to adopt "a healthy disrespect for the past" when planning future strategies for reaching the evolving U.S. shopper.

Members: View the presentation here.

Shopper Mindset: Purchase Influences in the Home Improvement Channel from Planet Insights

Women shopping at Lowe's and The Home Depot are significantly influenced by special displays but pay little attention to in-store radio, according to exclusive research from Planet Insights. The research company this month examines shopping behavior in the home improvement channel and its two dominant chains.

Members: View the research here.

Case Studies: The Best of Retail Event Marketing 2006 from Event Marketer

For the third year, the Institute mines the entries of Event Marketer magazine's Ex Awards to present case studies on successful event programs at retail. Among the trends evident in this year's 26 campaigns are the impact of product demonstrations on sales and the rise of retailer-driven mobile tours.

Members: View the case studies here.

Awards: Design of the Times Winners Unveiled

Design Phase Inc. earned bragging rights by taking home the top award in the 2006 Design of the Times competition sponsored by P-O-P Times. The interactive kiosk Design Phase created to help launch Microsoft's Xbox 360 video game console highlights a gallery of hundreds of entries to this year's competition, now complete with producer information and award status.

Members: View the winners here.

Welcome New Institute Members

The In-Store Marketing Institute is delighted to welcome new and renewing members to the Institute family. Below is a list of the companies that signed up recently. Welcome aboard.

  • AllPak Container Inc.
  • Atlas Packaging
  • Carhartt
  • Church & Dwight
  • Circle One Marketing
  • CVS/pharmacy
  • Daymon Worldwide
  • Display Boys
  • Eastman Chemical Co.
  • Fish Group
  • Fiskars Brands, Inc.
  • Global Marketing Group
  • GNC/Kell
  • Harvey & Daughters
  • Honeywell
  • Impact Fulfillment Services
  • Interstate Container
  • ITW Brands
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • L'Oreal
  • MasterTag
  • Milmour Products Inc.
  • MSA Safety Works
  • National In-Store
  • New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc.
  • New York University
  • Packaging Specialists
  • POP Displays
  • Proteus
  • Strategic America
  • Unified Resources In Display
  • University of Arkansas, Sam Walton College of Business